top of page

 Editorials

Editors Choice
Jenny Pearl

November 30, 2025 The Weight of Power and the Burden of Law: Netanyahu on Trial Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, stands today at the crossroads of power and accountability. For decades, he has shaped Israeli politics with a precision few leaders can match. He has been the architect of policies, the strategist of wars, and the voice of his nation on the global stage. Yet now, he faces accusations that pierce beyond politics and into the domain of international law, morality, and humanity itself. The International Criminal Court, an institution designed not to be swayed by popularity or office, has issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu. The charges are grave: war crimes, crimes against humanity, deliberate starvation of civilians, and orchestrating attacks that put noncombatants in the crossfire. To the uninitiated, these may seem like legal abstractions. But the reality is visceral. Children denied food, families trapped without medicine, hospitals left in ruins. These are not numbers or statistics; they are human lives caught in the machinery of war, suffering under decisions allegedly orchestrated from the highest corridors of power. Netanyahu’s alleged actions, if proven, are the embodiment of a legal principle known to every student of international law: leaders are not above the law. History has taught us that the mantle of office is no shield from accountability. From Nuremberg to The Hague, from Rwanda to the Balkans, the precedent is clear. Power confers responsibility, and responsibility carries consequences. It is a lesson both simple and unyielding: those who command armies, direct policy, and determine the fate of civilians must answer for their choices. What makes these allegations particularly striking is their systematic nature. The ICC and human rights organizations do not describe random errors or accidental harm. They describe deliberate policies; strategies that deprived civilians of basic necessities, attacks knowingly placed against populations, and actions that resulted in widespread suffering. This is not the chaos of battle. This is the orchestration of war in a manner that, the court argues, violates the very laws designed to protect human life. Netanyahu’s defense is familiar to any seasoned politician under scrutiny: a blend of denial, claims of political persecution, and appeals to loyalty and patriotism. He frames these charges as a witch-hunt, a campaign against a leader who has served his country tirelessly. And perhaps there is truth in the complexity of politics, every law and accusation exists in a tangled web of strategy, loyalty, and perception. Yet the ICC does not adjudicate politics. It adjudicates facts, evidence, and law. The suffering of civilians is not diminished by the rhetoric of political survival. The stakes are immense. If Netanyahu is held accountable, it sends a signal to leaders everywhere: the shield of office cannot protect those who violate humanity’s most basic laws. If he is not, the world risks a dangerous precedent, that power, when wielded skillfully, may be untouchable even in the face of the gravest allegations. Accountability is the fulcrum upon which democracy, law, and morality balance. To falter is to tilt that balance toward impunity. Let us not confuse this editorial with partisan attacks or political maneuvering. The focus here is not ideology but principle. It is the recognition that governance carries with it a moral and legal duty. To lead is to be answerable, not only to voters, but to the world and to the law that protects the innocent. War, by its nature, is tragic. But the law exists to prevent war from descending into systematic cruelty. It exists to protect those who cannot defend themselves, to ensure that humanity is not wholly sacrificed on the altar of strategy or ambition. Benjamin Netanyahu’s trial, whether it reaches conviction or acquittal, is more than the story of a man. It is the story of the fragile line between leadership and impunity, the fragile boundary between authority and accountability. Every judge, every lawyer, every investigator, every reporter, and every citizen watching bears witness to this test of principle. Will law hold sway over power? Will human life be safeguarded against the might of the state? The answers, for now, remain to be written, but the questions themselves are monumental. In a world where leaders often operate in shadows, where decisions made in marble halls reverberate in the lives of ordinary people, the trial of Netanyahu is a reminder. Power is intoxicating. Authority is persuasive. But the Universal Law, patient, unyielding, and blind, waits. It waits not for vengeance, not for applause, but for justice. And in that waiting, it reminds us all of the enduring truth: the greater the power, the heavier the responsibility.

Editors Choice
Jenny Pearl

Nov. 27, 2025 If Thanksgiving were a movie, the version most people know is the G-rated trailer: Pilgrims in shiny buckles, “helpful Indians” holding decorative corn, everyone gathering for a peaceful potluck that ends with turkey, pie, and a group hug. The actual story is closer to a gritty, award-winning historical drama where everyone does their best to stay alive, politics are messy, motives are complicated, and nobody’s hair looks that perfect. Let’s begin. 🌾 BEFORE THE PILGRIMS: THE LAND OF PLENTY (WITH A LOT FEWER PEOPLE) Before the Mayflower showed up, New England was home to thriving Native nations — the Wampanoag, Nipmuc, Pequot, Massachusett, and others — who had their own harvest festivals, rituals, and complex diplomacy. Think of them as the original “farm-to-table” experts. ​ Then came European diseases in 1616–1619, wiping out up to 90% of the coastal population. Imagine hosting a beautiful neighborhood — then suddenly your entire community disappears in a tragedy you don’t understand. ​ By the time the Pilgrims arrived, the land wasn’t “empty.” It had been devastated. ​ ⚓ ENTER THE PILGRIMS: STRUGGLING, STARVING, AND NOT EXACTLY HEROIC ​ The Pilgrims didn’t arrive ready to build a shining beacon of democracy. They arrived freezing, hungry, and very willing to steal from Indigenous storage pits and graves because… well, winter was winning. William Bradford literally wrote about this grave-robbing himself. Bold choice. They survived because the Wampanoag shared knowledge of farming, fishing, and the geography. Without this help, Plymouth might’ve been a short-lived footnote. ​ 🥧 THE 1621 FEAST: NOT WHAT YOU THINK The famous “first Thanksgiving”? Not a Thanksgiving. Not religious. Not invited. Not peaceful cooperation so much as a diplomatic emergency meeting. Edward Winslow wrote the only detailed account — and here’s the short version: The Pilgrims were doing a harvest celebration. They fired guns as part of the festivities (as one does, apparently). A group of 90 armed Wampanoag men rushed in, thinking maybe the newcomers were under attack. They stayed for three days. They brought deer. There was no pumpkin pie, no cranberry sauce, and probably no turkey. (Sorry, Hallmark.) This was less Friendsgiving and more “corporate merger negotiation with venison.” ​ 🔥 PEACE… AND THEN A WHOLE LOT OF NOPE Whatever good feelings existed did not last long. As more Europeans arrived, land got taken, livestock destroyed Indigenous fields, treaties got twisted, and tension turned into all-out war. King Philip’s War (1675–1676) was so deadly that, per capita, it makes modern wars look tame. Entire villages burned. Families enslaved. Wampanoag society nearly destroyed. This is the part your school textbook skipped to “protect the children,” which is ironic, because children reenact the feast every year with construction paper hats. ​ 🤝 HOW THANKSGIVING BECAME A HOLIDAY (HINT: POLITICS) The Pilgrims didn’t start the national holiday. The idea didn’t catch on for more than a century. Nobody said, “See you next year for another feast!” Instead: Puritans held occasional “Thanksgiving Days” that were about fasting, praying, and feeling guilty — the least festive holiday imaginable. In the 1800s, magazine editor Sarah Josepha Hale (the Mary Poppins of moral persuasion) lobbied nonstop for a unified national Thanksgiving. Abraham Lincoln made it official in 1863 — during the Civil War — because nothing says “unity” like roasted turkey while the country is literally fighting itself. In 1939, FDR even moved the date to boost Christmas shopping. Yup — we literally have “Franksgiving.” The holiday is more political invention than Pilgrim tradition. ​ 🧝‍♂️ TEXTBOOK MYTHOLOGY: AMERICA’S FAVORITE FAIRY TALE Over time, textbooks airbrushed away: epidemics grave-robbing the Pequot massacre (celebrated with a colonial “Thanksgiving”) King Philip’s War Indigenous enslavement land theft the fact that the Wampanoag had strategic reasons for not kicking out the Pilgrims immediately Instead, the story became: “Once upon a time, the Pilgrims and Indians shared a meal and America lived happily ever after.” It’s basically historical fanfiction. ​ 🪶 INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVES: THE PART WE SHOULD’VE HEARD FIRST Today, Wampanoag descendants and many Native nations describe Thanksgiving as: A reminder of genocide, A symbol of broken treaties, A myth used to justify colonial expansion, A story that portrays them as side characters in their own land. Since 1970, Indigenous activists have held a National Day of Mourning at Plymouth Rock, pointing out that the feel-good version of Thanksgiving erases centuries of suffering. As Wampanoag educators like Linda Coombs put it: “We helped them survive, but they did not help us survive in return.” Mic drop. 🦅 SO WHAT IS THANKSGIVING TODAY? Thanksgiving now is a patchwork quilt: 🟡 Traditional family dinners 🟡 Immigrant reinterpretations (tamales, curry, pancit, jollof rice at the table) 🟡 Indigenous mourning ceremonies 🟡 Volunteerism and charity 🟡 Travel chaos 🟡 Football 🟡 Black Friday (aka The Hunger Games for discounted appliances) It’s a holiday that America continuously rewrites — sometimes beautifully, sometimes problematically, always revealing something about our collective identity. ​ 🎯 THE TAKEAWAY: A HOLIDAY WITH TWO STORIES Story 1: The Myth Pilgrims + Native Americans = happy feast = America born in friendship. Story 2: The Reality Epidemic, desperation, diplomacy Cultural misunderstanding Violence, war, and colonization Myth-making to soothe national tensions A holiday reinvented for politics, unity, and sales Both stories coexist today — one comforting, one challenging. ​ The important thing isn’t to choose between them. It’s to recognize the whole picture and decide what meaning we want this holiday to carry moving forward. ​ If we can hold gratitude and honesty in the same hand… maybe we’ll finally have something worth celebrating.

MYTH VS. FACT COMPARISON

Myth:  Pilgrims invited Indigenous people to a friendly feast.

Fact:   Wampanoag arrived armed after hearing gunfire.

Myth:  Thanksgiving celebrates a moment of lasting peace.

Fact:   The alliance collapsed into one of the bloodiest wars in North America.

Myth:  Pilgrims were fleeing “religious persecution.”

Fact:   They sought to impose their own restrictive religious system in a new land.

Myth:  Pilgrims were self-sufficient and resourceful.

Fact:   They survived due to Indigenous agricultural knowledge.

Myth:  Early Thanksgivings were joyous feasts.

Fact:   Puritan thanksgivings were solemn religious fasts.

Myth:  Thanksgiving was honored continuously from 1621 onward.

Fact:    It only became a national holiday in 1863 and was mythologized in the 1900s.

Editors Choice
Jenny Pearl

Nov. 25, 2025

 

Over the past decade, Pasco County, Florida, has faced growing scrutiny over its policing practices and government oversight. Reports, lawsuits, and investigative findings suggest patterns of civil-rights violations, including cases involving aggressive “predictive policing,” repeated home visits without clear legal justification, alleged harassment of families, and accusations of unwarranted child-protection involvement.

Sheriff Chris Nocco, who has led the Pasco County Sheriff’s Office since 2011, oversaw many of the programs later condemned by civil-rights groups and investigated by national newspapers. While Nocco has not faced personal criminal prosecution, the Sheriff’s Office has settled lawsuits, repealed controversial programs, and received federal criticism for violations involving privacy, false arrests, due process, and retaliatory policing.

The article below outlines how these policies disproportionately affected vulnerable communities, including families with children, people living in poverty, and individuals previously marked by law enforcement data systems. It also documents the lack of meaningful accountability mechanisms in the county, even as residents filed complaints and national organisations highlighted systemic issues.

The overall theme underscores the need for transparency, independent oversight, and stronger protections for civil liberties to prevent future abuse of power.

Bottom line: Chris Nocco was sheriff during the period of the controversial predictive policing program, and while he was legally forced to admit wrongdoing, shut down the program, and pay a settlement, he has not been removed from his role. Accountability came via paying off his victims, not via political ouster or prosecution.  The legal system failed to protect and instead allowed a stalker and crooked sheriff to continue his tyrannical leadership. 

​How many lives have been ruined by this greedy, corrupt politician who was hired to protect, not destroy, those who reside in his county?   A serial criminal like this doesn't stop committing crimes because the law tells them to.  They find another way to commit them without getting caught, or they become the LAW.

  • ArtistJennyPearl
  • My Art Gallery
  • Artist Jenny Pearl
  • ArtistJennyPearl
  • ArtistJennyPearl
© Все права защищены
bottom of page